The woodblock prints of Charles Bolsius stand at the intersection of two visual worlds: the progressive European printmaking culture of the 1920s and the architectural and cultural vernacular of the American Southwest. His work belongs to a modernist lineage grounded in formal economy, material immediacy, and place-based subject matter—shaped first in the Netherlands and later in the arid landscapes of New Mexico and Arizona.

Bolsius studied at the Royal Academy of Art in The Hague during a pivotal moment in Dutch printmaking. In the aftermath of World War I, the Netherlands saw a resurgence of interest in graphic arts, particularly woodcut, as both a democratic medium and a vehicle for modernist experimentation. Dutch artists such as Henri van Straten and Frans Masereel—though Belgian, widely circulated in the Netherlands—brought a social and expressive charge to woodcut, aligning the form with Expressionism’s emotional directness and raw visual power. Print portfolios, artist books, and small-run publications were increasingly common, and the relief print became an accessible, avant-garde mode of image-making.

Bolsius absorbed this context, but his own approach was less politically didactic and more formally architectural. His early works show the hallmarks of this Northern European tradition: bold contrast, compressed compositions, and an emphasis on direct carving into the block. Yet rather than embracing narrative or urban themes, he was drawn to structure, mass, and spatial tension—qualities that translated seamlessly when he immigrated to the United States in the early 1930s.

Living in New Mexico and later Tucson, Arizona, Bolsius had shifted his focus to the material culture of the American Southwest. His prints from this period retain the technical vocabulary of the Dutch and German Expressionist woodcut but are newly engaged with adobe architecture, mission churches, and desert landscapes. He brought the formal discipline of European modernism to regional subject matter, avoiding sentimentality in favor of abstraction and restraint. The adobe wall, the silhouette of a church, or the shape of a cactus became graphic elements to be distilled and reassembled within the frame.

The carved block was not incidental; it was integral to his process and vision. His prints are not decorative but structural—quiet, analytical explorations of built and natural form. Through them, Bolsius extended the tradition of European Expressionist woodcut into an entirely new visual and geographic territory.